Two Theories of Creation: 
		Creation out of Nothing - Creation out of Chaosmos
		Thomas Jay Oord 
		The following lists represent the main ideas proposed in a panel 
		debate/discussion at the Wesleyan Philosophical Society meeting, Duke 
		University, March, 2008. 
		Nine Problems with Creatio Ex Nihilo
		1. Theoretical problem: absolute nothingness cannot be conceived. 
		2. Biblical problem: Scripture – in Genesis, 2 Peter, and elsewhere – 
		suggests creation from something (water, deep, chaos, invisible things, 
		etc.), not creation from absolutely nothing (see 
		Speaking the Language of Canaan: The Old Testament and the Israelite Perception                
    of the Physical World). 
		3. Historical problem: Creatio ex nihilo was first proposed by 
		Gnostics – Basilides and Valentinus – who assumed that creation was 
		inherently evil and that God does not act in history. It was adopted by 
		early Christian theologians to affirm the kind of absolute divine power 
		that many Christians – especially Wesleyans – now reject. 
		4. Empirical problem: We have no evidence that our universe originally 
		came into being from absolutely nothing. 
		5. Creation at an instant problem: We have no evidence in the history of 
		the universe after the big bang that entities can emerge instantaneously 
		from absolute nothingness. Out of nothing comes nothing (ex nihil, nihil 
		fit). 
		6. Solitary power problem: Creatio ex nihilo assumes that a 
		powerful God once acted alone. But power is a social concept only 
		meaningful in relation to others. 
		7. Errant revelation problem: The God with the capacity to create 
		something from absolutely nothing would apparently have the power to 
		guarantee an unambiguous and inerrant message of salvation (for example, 
		inerrant Bible). An unambiguously clear and inerrant divine revelation 
		does not exist (see The Modern Inerrancy Debate). 
		8. Evil problem: If God once had the power to create from absolutely 
		nothing, God essentially retains that power. But a God of love with this 
		capacity is culpable for failing to prevent genuine evil (see
		The Problem of "Natural" Evil). 
		9. Empire Problem: The kind of divine power implied in creatio ex 
		nihilo supports a theology of empire, which is based upon unilateral 
		force and control of others. 
		Twelve Advantages to Creation out of Chaosmos
		1. Theoretical advantage: We can conceive of creating something from 
		materials previously organized differently or in a different state. 
		2. Biblical advantage: This theory generally fits with the biblical 
		notion – in Genesis, 2 Peter, and elsewhere – that God creates from 
		something (water, deep, chaos, etc.; see
		Genesis Bible Study Lesson Two: The Cultural Context of Israel). 
		3. Historical advantage: This general theory was affirmed by early 
		Christian theologians (although by few Christian theologians after the 
		2nd century) and deemed a logical possibility by such influential 
		Christians as Thomas Aquinas. 
		4. Empirical advantage: This theory corresponds with what we know from 
		the evolution of life, in terms of something new evolving from what has 
		come before. 
		5. Superstring advantage: This theory is compatible with contemporary 
		superstring theories (see physicists Neil Turok, Paul Steinhardt, John 
		Barrow, Alan Guth, and others). 
		6. Analogy with creature creativity: This theory corresponds with how we 
		understand our own creating activity, without equating the Creator with 
		the creatures. 
		7. Multiple powers advantage: This theory fits with our everyday notion 
		of power as that which can only be understood in relation to other 
		powers. Power is social. 
		8. Dynamic revelation advantage: This theory fits better with a doctrine 
		of dynamic biblical inspiration whereby God interacts with creatures 
		possessing their own (God-given) capacities, notions, and tendencies – 
		including capacities for error (see Revelation and Inspiration             
    of Scripture). 
		9. Problem of evil advantage: If God has never created from absolutely 
		nothing, it seems plausible that God does not have the ability to 
		control others entirely. A God of love without the ability to control 
		others entirely should not be charged with culpability for failing to 
		prevent the evils caused by free or indeterminate creatures. 
		10. Relational advantage: A God who always enjoys relations with 
		non-divine others and creates by means of those relations is an 
		essentially relational God (see Relational 
		Holiness). 
		11. Love advantage: If being related to others is necessary to love 
		others, a God who has always enjoyed relations with non-divine others 
		might be said to love non-divine others essentially and not arbitrarily. 
		Thus God’s nature is love. 
		12. Ethics advantage: This theory suggests that God works persuasively 
		with others rather than coercing them, and this serves as a model for 
		nonviolent creaturely ethics arising from our essential responsibilities 
		to the other.  
		Thomas Jay Oord, Ph.D. 
		Northwest Nazarene University  
      -Thomas J. Oord, Copyright ©        
      2018, Thomas J. 
		Oord - 
All Rights Reserved 
		Other text and logos on this page Copyright ©       
      2018, CRI/Voice, 
		Institute See Copyright and User Information 
Notice
    
      |