| 
    
    
		
   
	Click here to 
	
	   | 
    
      
    "He Descended into Hell" 
	Sheol, Hell, and the Dead         
    	Dennis Bratcher and Jirair Tashjian          
    The Apostles' Creed              
    
      I believe in God, the Father Almighty, 
      Creator of heaven and earth, and in Jesus Christ, his only begotten Son, 
      our Lord; who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary, 
      suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, dead and buried.
      He descended into hell. The third day he rose again from the dead. 
      He ascended into heaven, and sits at the right hand of God the Father 
      Almighty. From thence he shall come to judge the quick and the dead. I 
      believe in the Holy Spirit. I believe in the holy catholic church, the 
      communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the 
      body, and the life everlasting. Amen.              
     
    The phrase “he descended into hell”  in the Apostle's Creed often causes 
    confusion for modern Christians, especially evangelical Christians, who are 
    accustomed to hearing the term "hell" used in very different ways. In many 
    of those Christian traditions “hell”  has come to mean only the place of 
    eternal punishment after death.  With this meaning, many also connect 
    this part of the Apostle's Creed with several passages in 1 Peter that seem 
    to refer to Jesus "preaching to the dead" who are presumably in hell.              
    There are two perspectives necessary to understand this issue, one 
    cultural and historical and the other exegetical. In the old King James 
    Version, the English word “hell” actually was used to translate two 
    different words and two very different concepts. One term was the word 
    gehenna, (for example, Matt 5:22). This was adapted from the name of a 
    valley to the south of the Temple in Jerusalem where the city garbage was 
    burned, the “Valley of Hinnom.” Because of the perpetual fires, and also 
    because there had been idols to the Canaanite god Molech erected there to 
    which were offered human sacrifices,              
    ge hinnom (“valley of Hinnom” in Hebrew; 2 Kings 23:10) became a symbol for the 
    judgment of God. The fires also came to symbolize that punishment and 
    destruction, and became the more common way to conceptualize “hell” in later 
    Christian tradition.               
    Another term, and one more relevant to our topic, is the Greek term Hades 
    (for example, Matt 11:23). This term comes from Greek mythology in which it 
    was the abode of the dead. It was used to translate into Greek the Hebrew 
    concept of Sheol. While in the Old Testament this term was not 
    mythological, it was a metaphorical way to talk about what happened to 
    people when they died. Sheol was simply the place where dead people go. It 
    was almost synonymous with death and especially “grave,” and indeed is used 
    that way in several Old Testament passages, for example, Psa 49:14:               
    	Like sheep they are appointed for Sheol; 
      Death shall be their shepherd; straight to the grave they descend, and 
      their form shall waste away; Sheol shall be their home.              
    In other words, Sheol or Hades was a poetic way to say, “they died and 
    were buried.” It is in this sense that the phrase in the Apostles’ Creed is 
    used, using the ambiguous word “hell” in English, when the more precise idea 
    of Hades actually lies behind the statement. “He descended into hell” then 
    becomes nothing more than a statement that Jesus died and was placed in the 
    tomb, the grave. Using Hebrew concepts, Israelites would say he descended into Sheol, 
	that is, was lowered into the grave. Or they could say that he slept with the fathers 
	(for example, 1 Kings 2:10), that 
	is, was placed in a family tomb. It is in that context that the 
    affirmation of the resurrection is so powerful.              
    This confusion of the concept may already have been at work in the early 
    church, and may even have influenced the passages in 1 Peter, recognized by 
    most scholars to be some of the latest in the New Testament written near the 
    end of the first century. We cannot be sure of that, but in any case there 
    is more to be gained in looking exegetically at those passages.              
    In two passages in 1 Peter (3:19, 4:6) it might sound as if Jesus 
    preached to those who have already died, presumably with the goal of calling 
    them to repentance. This is especially appealing when those verses are read 
    in light of the later concept of purgatory developed in Catholic tradition 
    from passages in the apocryphal books of Macabees. However, a careful 
    examination of the passages in 1 Peter does not confirm that perspective 
    (cf. J. Ramsey Michaels, Word Biblical Commentary).               
      1 Peter 3:18-20a:  For Christ also 
    suffered for sins once for all, the righteous for the unrighteous, in order 
    to bring you to God. He was put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the 
    spirit, in which also he went and made a proclamation to the spirits 
    in prison, who in former times did not obey . . .         
    In 3:19 the Greek word kyrusso is used, translated "made a 
	proclamation," the only occurrence of the 
    word in 1 Peter. In other passages in 1 Peter when the redemptive 
    proclamation of the gospel is intended, the word used is euaggelizo 
	(1 Pet 2:9, 4:6; pronounced euangelizo in English). 
    So the term translated "preached" in some versions of 3:19 should more 
    correctly be rendered "made proclamation" (so New Revised English Bible, above, NASB, NRSV, as opposed to the NIV). This means that the purpose of 
    Christ's activity was not to convert imprisoned spirits but to announce his 
    vindication through his death and resurrection (3:18).  
		The "imprisoned 
    spirits" may be understood in the sense of evil spirits secluded or hiding 
    from the presence and judgment of God. Thus Christ's proclamation brings 
    them out into the open and brings them into submission, much like 
    Philippians 2:10.  
		Philippians 2:8 he humbled himself and became obedient 
		to the point of death-- even death on a cross. 2:9 Therefore God also 
		highly exalted him and gave him the name that is above every name, 2:10 
		so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bend, in heaven and on 
		earth and under the earth, 2:11 and every tongue should confess that 
		Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.  
		This interpretation is supported by the statement in 1 
    Peter 3:22, that Christ received the submission of angels, 
    authorities, and powers.  
		 1 Peter 3:21 . . .through the resurrection of 
		Jesus Christ, 3:22 who has gone into heaven and is at the right hand of 
		God, with angels, authorities, and powers made subject to him.  
		Or it is possible that the "imprisoned spirits" 
		refer to everyone who had died, with "prison" being a metaphorical way 
		to refer to death itself. In any case, the proclamation made is that 
		death has been conquered in Jesus' resurrection.              
    In 4:6 the word used is euaggelizo, but in a different sense than 
    kyrusso  is used in 3:19.              
      1 Peter 4:3-6: You have already spent 
    enough time in doing what the Gentiles like to do, living in licentiousness, 
    passions, drunkenness, revels, carousing, and lawless idolatry. 4:4 They are 
    surprised that you no longer join them in the same excesses of dissipation, 
    and so they blaspheme. 4:5 But they will have to give an accounting to him 
    who stands ready to judge the living and the dead. 4:6 For this is the 
    reason the gospel was proclaimed even to the dead, so that, though 
    they had been judged in the flesh as everyone is judged, they might live in 
    the spirit as God does.         
      The sense of 1 Peter 4:6 is best rendered in the Revised English Bible 
    as follows:               
    	That was why the gospel was preached 
      even to the dead: in order that, although in the body they were condemned 
      to die as everyone else dies, yet in the spirit they might live as God 
      lives.              
      This means that the gospel "was preached" in the past to people 
      who are now dead, not that it was preached now by Christ to those 
      who are in the realm of the dead. The NRSV seems to render it along the 
      same lines.  This is also more obviously the meaning in 3:19 that 
      gives an example from the past.  In other words, preaching (euaggelizo) to those who are now dead was made in the past to call them 
      to repentance and eternal life, while the death of Jesus is a proclamation 
		(kyrusso)  of condemnation to those who are now dead who had earlier 
      refused to respond to that preaching.              
    This strongly suggests that we cannot on the basis of 1 Peter make a case 
    for the proposition that the dead may still respond to the gospel and be 
    saved. In light of this evidence, there does not seem to be any biblical 
    support, and very little support in early Christian tradition beyond the 
	later 
    highly questionable concept of purgatory, that Jesus descended into hell and 
    preached to those who had already died with the goal of calling them to 
    repentance beyond the grave.  
		This returns us to the phrase in the Apostles' Creed with which we 
		are familiar in English:  "He descended into hell."  In the Greek 
		version of the Apostles' Creed, the word translated "hell" is κατώτατα 
		(katātata), "the lowest."  In the Latin version the word is 
		inferos, "those below."  In both languages the words refer to the 
		underworld as the dwelling place of the dead. So, in either of the 
		original versions of the Creed, the phrase is best translated as "he 
		descended into the underworld," or "he descended into the realm of the 
		dead."  In non-poetic language, it is simply "he was buried." 
		The phrase in the Apostles’ Creed simply refers 
    to the fact that Jesus died and was buried, from which he arose victorious 
    over death. The proclamation that Jesus brought to those who had died was 
		that death had been conquered and they would be freed from the grip and 
		power of death. 
		This perspective is actually the earliest interpretation of Jesus' 
		"descent into hell."  It is still preserved in the Roman Catholic
		Catechism, although complicated by other affirmations. 
		
			The 
			frequent New Testament affirmations that Jesus was "raised from the 
			dead" presuppose that the crucified one sojourned in the realm of 
			the dead prior to his resurrection. This was the first meaning given 
			in the apostolic preaching to Christ's descent into hell: that 
			Jesus, like all men, experienced death and in his soul joined the 
			others in the realm of the dead . . .  
			Scripture calls the abode of the dead, to which the dead Christ 
			went down, "hell"—Sheol in Hebrew or Hades in 
			Greek—because those who are there are deprived of the vision of God. 
			Such is the case for all the dead, whether evil or righteous, while 
			they await the redeemer. . .  
			By the expression "He descended into hell," the Apostles' Creed 
			confesses that Jesus did really die and through his death for us 
			conquered death and the devil "who has the power of death" (Heb 
			2:14). In his human soul united to his divine person, the dead 
			Christ went down to the realm of the dead. He opened heaven's gates 
			for the just who had gone before him. -1- 
		 
    A question is often raised at this point: where was Jesus between his 
    death and the resurrection? I would simply suggest that this is a question 
    that arises much more from our modern concepts and metaphysics than it does 
    from the biblical perspective. That means that we are probably not going to 
    get a biblical answer for this question. From the biblical perspective, the 
    answer would be simply, he was in the grave, he was dead.              
    We have tended to overlay this perspective with a concept of immortality 
    of the soul that comes almost entirely from Greek philosophy rather than 
    from the pages of Scripture (see Body and Soul).   
    In that view, death is not really real, but only a doorway through which we 
    pass on the way from one level of existence to another. In that way of 
    thinking, the question of “where?” is forced to the foreground. But that is 
    not a question that is ever raised from the biblical traditions, which 
    suggests that from that perspective there will be no answer to the question.              
    The bottom line is that finally “where?” is not that important a 
    question, except to try to satisfy our curiosity about something that we 
    cannot know. Either we will live again after death or we will not. If we 
    accept that the resurrection of Jesus is the “first fruits” of those who 
    have died (1 Cor 15:21-26), then the how and when is of no significant 
    consequence. And finally the biblical testimony is not about the details, 
    but affirms more strongly than we sometimes can see the fact of the 
    resurrection as a source of hope. 
		Notes 
		1.
		Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd ed.,
		Part One, 
		Section Two, Chapter Two, Article 5,  Paragraph 1, #631-637, 
		Doubleday, 2003. In fairness, the Catechism also expresses the 
		Roman Catholic idea of Purgatory interwoven into this section.  [Return]              
    	-Dennis Bratcher and Jirair 
    Tashjian, Copyright ©       
    2018, Dennis 
    Bratcher 
     - All Rights Reserved  See Copyright and User Information Notice  | 
    
      
       Related pages  
    Old Testament 
      Christian Creeds 
      Issues in Biblical Interpretation  |